I looked through this again recently and I think the best replies are the ones that explain the reasoning, not just the final choice.

Even after some time, this is still the kind of conversation that can help both new and experienced readers. The answer usually depends on budget, timing, personal priorities, and how much risk someone is willing to carry. That is why it helps when members revisit the thread and add updated thinking instead of only repeating the first impression.

I had not thought about it that way before, but it actually makes sense.

I came back to this because it is still relevant.

What I find helpful is when people compare what they expected at the beginning with what they understand now after more experience.

This kind of conversation is useful because different members can reach different conclusions for good reasons, and that is often more helpful than one rigid answer.

What makes a discussion like this strong is not just the final answer but the reasoning behind it. People often discover that the right approach depends on timing, priorities, budget, or experience level. When members explain how their thinking changed, it gives the thread much more long-term value than a simple yes-or-no reply.

A topic like this can easily turn vague, so it really helps when people describe the tradeoffs they faced and what mattered most in the end.

Threads like this can become really valuable when people share specific situations and not just broad advice.

This kind of question invites the sort of discussion that makes a forum feel genuinely active.

This feels like the kind of topic where real examples would make the thread much stronger.

I think questions like this work best when members explain what changed their opinion over time.

It would be useful to hear different perspectives here instead of only one standard answer.